Yes, you have hair loss but consider that phrase, "hair loss". If I were to say to you that you've had fat loss, you'd probably respond with something to the effect of you've been working out or dieting. The fat loss is the side-effect of those actions.
Now when we think of hair loss, we don't follow that same line of thinking. We accept fat loss due to the action of dieting or cardio perhaps, but we act as if "hair loss" doesn't work the same way. Hair loss, like fat loss, is a result of another action. It is the effect, not the cause.
So when the time comes to reverse thinning, we focus on the hair and not the scalp from which it grows from. This causes us to spin our wheels being that omega scalps or scalps with working hair follicles can be prompted to grow thicker hair or faster hair growth pretty easy. Male pattern balding, light or severe, is not a nutrition problem at all or can be fixed with nutrition. It is a scalp condition issue. The condition of the scalp doesn't allow nutrition absorption amongst a few other issues. This eventually starves the hair follicles and hair loss is the result.
Receding? The follicles in the front of the scalp are disabling. Crown thinning? Those follicles are under the impression that the environment is not capable of continued growth. Simply put, unhappy follicles= hair loss. Back to the Barber is not meant to grow hair, it is meant to slowly change scalp condition from further deterioration to being met. Once met, the follicles know what to do next.
Comments